comparison in one paper was or was not statistically significantbut if you really believe this, what does it say. Are you taking the LET? And also this, from another blog comment : It is also striking how very close to the.05 threshhold some of the implied p-values are. Last week we discussed, simmons and Simonsohns survey of some of the literature on the so-called power pose, where they wrote: While the simplest explanation is that all studied effects are zero, it may be that one or two of them are real (any more. Summary Peer review can serve some useful purposes. But thats ok, nobodys claiming perfection. Recently some of those companies will also sell your design on tee shirts and deal with all the logistics including packaging, shipping, payments and even customer complaints. Not that they would endorse the above statement when written as crudely as in that equation, but I think this is how theyre operating. The peers of the power-pose researchers are. Click on the photo to read their testimonials!
Birds eye view dissertation proposal how many words of your LET journey from filing your LET application until LET day (to serve as a guide and remove the anxieties of first-time LET takers). We peer reviewed the Simmons and Simonsohn post. If the authors of many of these ppnas or Psychological Science-type papers really dont know what theyre doing (as seems to be the case then its no surprise that peer review will fail. LETers Choice Warm-Ups Book 1, order Now ( 395.00 read Testimonials. Replication studies have been performed on various power-pose experiments (indeed, its the null result from one of these replications that got this discussion going and the debate can continue. We created Warm-Ups as an orientation to the LET process and as a supplement to materials youve collected over your bachelors degree/education units studies. And sometimes a paper will get unsupportive reviews. I use both but because of recent changes at Cafepress I cant recommend joining them. Weve seen this a lot in recent years, for example that paper on ovulation and voting was reviewed by peers who didnt realize the implausibility of 20-percentage-point vote swings during the campaign, peers who also didnt know about the garden of forking paths. But to the extent the reviewers are actually peers of the authors, they can easily have the same blind spots.